Bioidentical Hormone replacement
Bioidentical Hormone Replacement Therapy (BHRT): Understanding the Difference

Bioidentical Hormone Replacement Therapy (BHRT): What the Research Really Shows
Hormones regulate nearly every system in the body — energy, cognition, mood, libido, metabolism, and sleep. As estrogen, progesterone, and testosterone decline with age, many individuals experience:
- Persistent fatigue
- Low libido
- Brain fog and memory changes
- Slower cognitive processing
- Difficulty completing tasks as efficiently
- Mood changes or depression
For many patients, appropriately prescribed hormone therapy can significantly improve quality of life. However, understanding the research is essential.
Understanding Conventional Hormone Therapy and the WHI
In 2002, the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) dramatically changed how hormone therapy is viewed.
The WHI evaluated:
- Conjugated equine estrogen (CEE)
- Medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA)
These are not bioidentical hormones.
WHI Findings — Combined CEE + MPA
The combined estrogen-progestin arm demonstrated:
- 26% increased risk of invasive breast cancer
(Hazard Ratio [HR] 1.26; 95% CI 1.00–1.59)¹ - Increased risk of stroke and venous thromboembolism
These findings led to major changes in prescribing practices.
WHI Findings — Estrogen Alone (Women Without Uterus)
Interestingly, the estrogen-only arm showed:
- 23% reduction in breast cancer incidence during long-term follow-up
(HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.62–0.95)²
This distinction is important. The increased breast cancer risk observed in WHI was primarily associated with the synthetic progestin (MPA), not estrogen alone.
Bioidentical Hormones: What Does the Data Show?
Bioidentical hormones are chemically identical to human hormones and are often derived from plant sources such as wild yam before pharmaceutical processing.
Research evaluating bioidentical formulations suggests potential differences in risk profiles compared to synthetic progestins.
The Dayton Study (Glaser et al.)
A long-term prospective cohort study conducted in Dayton, Ohio evaluated women treated with subcutaneous testosterone therapy (with or without estrogen).
Findings included:
- 39–40% lower-than-expected incidence of invasive breast cancer compared to SEER population data³
This study suggests that testosterone therapy in women may not increase — and may potentially reduce — breast cancer risk compared to predicted rates.
Important note:
This was an observational study comparing treated patients to population-based expected incidence, not a randomized controlled trial.
The French E3N Cohort Study
The large French E3N observational cohort evaluated different hormone therapy combinations.
Findings:
- Estrogen combined with micronized progesterone was not associated with increased breast cancer risk compared to non-users⁴
- Synthetic progestins were associated with increased risk
This suggests that the type of progesterone used may significantly influence breast cancer risk.
What This Means Clinically
Hormone therapy risk is influenced by:
- Type of hormone
- Synthetic vs bioidentical structure
- Route (oral vs transdermal vs subcutaneous)
- Dose
- Age at initiation
- Time since menopause
- Individual risk factors
Modern hormone therapy is far more individualized than early WHI-era protocols.
Why Patients Seek Hormone Optimization
Patients commonly report:
- Feeling like a “slower version” of themselves
- Reduced mental clarity
- Decreased motivation
- Loss of libido
- Mood instability
When therapy is appropriately prescribed and monitored, many patients report:
- Improved energy
- Clearer thinking
- Enhanced mood
- Better sleep
- Restored vitality
Important Disclaimer
While observational studies suggest potential differences in risk profiles between synthetic progestins and bioidentical progesterone or testosterone, large-scale randomized trials specifically evaluating compounded bioidentical hormone therapy remain limited.
Hormone therapy should always be:
- Lab-guided
- Individually prescribed
- Carefully monitored
- Based on personal risk assessment
References
- Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, et al.
Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial.
JAMA. 2002;288(3):321–333. - LaCroix AZ, Chlebowski RT, Manson JE, et al.
Health outcomes after stopping conjugated equine estrogens among postmenopausal women with prior hysterectomy.
JAMA. 2011;305(13):1305–1314. - Glaser R, York AE, Dimitrakakis C.
Incidence of invasive breast cancer in women treated with testosterone implants: a prospective 10-year cohort study.
Maturitas. 2019;118:45–49. - Fournier A, Berrino F, Riboli E, Avenel V, Clavel-Chapelon F.
Breast cancer risk in relation to different types of hormone replacement therapy in the E3N-EPIC cohort.
Int J Cancer. 2005;114(3):448–454.

